Rank-wise Water Quality Index (WQI) – All States & UTs
| Rank | Region Name | WQI Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mizoram | 92.5 |
| 2 | Sikkim | 91.0 |
| 3 | Arunachal Pradesh | 90.0 |
| 4 | Meghalaya | 89.5 |
| 5 | Manipur | 88.0 |
| 6 | Nagaland | 87.5 |
| 7 | Tripura | 86.0 |
| 8 | Kerala | 85.0 |
| 9 | Goa | 84.0 |
| 10 | Himachal Pradesh | 83.0 |
| 11 | Uttarakhand | 82.0 |
| 12 | Assam | 80.5 |
| 13 | Lakshadweep | 80.0 |
| 14 | Andaman & Nicobar Islands | 79.5 |
| 15 | Puducherry | 78.0 |
| 16 | Chandigarh | 77.5 |
| 17 | Karnataka | 76.0 |
| 18 | Tamil Nadu | 75.0 |
| 19 | Telangana | 74.0 |
| 20 | Odisha | 73.0 |
| 21 | Chhattisgarh | 72.0 |
| 22 | Madhya Pradesh | 70.5 |
| 23 | Andhra Pradesh | 70.0 |
| 24 | Jharkhand | 69.0 |
| 25 | Bihar | 68.0 |
| 26 | West Bengal | 67.0 |
| 27 | Rajasthan | 66.0 |
| 28 | Punjab | 65.0 |
| 29 | Haryana | 64.0 |
| 30 | Gujarat | 63.0 |
| 31 | Jammu & Kashmir | 62.0 |
| 32 | Ladakh | 61.0 |
| 33 | DNHDD | 60.0 |
| 34 | Maharashtra | 58.5 |
| 35 | Uttar Pradesh | 55.0 |
| 36 | Delhi | 50.0 |
Status of Polluted Water Bodies
Water Quality Index (WQI) Framework
The anticipated Water Quality Index (WQI) for 2025 serves as a standardized measure to evaluate the overall health of water bodies across all 36 states and union territories of India. The WQI is calculated on a scale of 0 to 100 using key scientific parameters such as:
- Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
- Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
- pH Levels
- Presence of Coliform Bacteria
Higher WQI scores indicate better water quality suitable for drinking, irrigation, and aquatic life, while lower scores reflect poor water quality that poses serious environmental and health risks.
Data Sources and Projections
The projected WQI values for 2025 are derived from multiple reliable sources, including:
- CPCB Water Quality Data (2022)
- NITI Aayog’s Composite Water Management Index (CWMI)
- Performance trends of national programs such as the Namami Gange Programme and the Jal Jeevan Mission
Together, these sources provide a strong scientific foundation for assessing expected water quality conditions across different regions of India.
Regional Patterns and Disparities
Policy Implications and Need for Targeted Action
The WQI-based assessment highlights serious inequalities in water resource management across India. States with lower WQI scores require urgent and targeted policy interventions, including:
- Expansion and modernization of sewage treatment infrastructure
- Strict enforcement of industrial wastewater discharge regulations
- Promotion of water recycling, reuse, and conservation practices
- Strengthening real-time water quality monitoring and public reporting systems
- Encouraging community participation in water conservation and pollution control
These measures are essential to improve water quality, protect public health, and ensure environmental sustainability.
Geographical Influences on Water Quality in India
Water Quality in the Northeastern States
The northeastern states of India, particularly Mizoram, Sikkim, and Arunachal Pradesh, exhibit excellent water quality, with WQI values exceeding 90. This superior quality is largely attributed to heavy annual monsoon rainfall, often exceeding 2,000 mm, which naturally flushes pollutants from rivers and streams. The dense forest cover across the region also acts as a natural filtration system for surface runoff, preventing excessive contamination.
Mizoram stands out with a WQI score of 92.5. Major rivers such as the Tlawng remain largely free from industrial and urban pollution. Additionally, the state’s low population density of around 52 persons per square kilometer results in limited sewage generation and minimal pressure on water resources. These natural and demographic advantages together support consistently high water quality.
Water Quality in Arid Regions: The Case of Rajasthan
In contrast to the northeastern region, Rajasthan highlights the negative impact of arid climatic conditions on water quality. With a WQI score of 66, the state faces serious water quality challenges due to extreme water scarcity and excessive dependence on groundwater for agricultural and domestic use. Overextraction of groundwater has led to rising salinity and high nitrate concentrations in many districts.
According to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) 2024 data, Rajasthan generates nearly 1,200 million liters per day (MLD) of wastewater. However, only about 30% of this wastewater is treated adequately before discharge. The remaining untreated wastewater directly contaminates surface and groundwater sources, further worsening water quality in an already water-stressed environment.
Water Quality in Union Territories
India’s union territories demonstrate extreme contrasts in water quality conditions. Lakshadweep, a remote island territory surrounded by coral lagoons and marine ecosystems, maintains a relatively high WQI score of 80. The vast marine environment helps dilute pollutants naturally, resulting in better overall water quality.
On the other hand, Delhi represents one of the most severe cases of urban water pollution in the country. With a WQI score of only 50, the capital suffers from intense sewage contamination, particularly in the Yamuna River. Nearly 3,000 MLD of untreated sewage is discharged daily into the river through 22 major drains. This massive discharge reduces dissolved oxygen levels to below 2 mg/L in several stretches. CPCB data further indicates that Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) levels frequently exceed 30 mg/L, making the river water unfit even for bathing.
Industrial and Agricultural Pressures on Water Bodies in India
The impact of industrialization and agriculture on water bodies across India remains severe and uneven across different states, as reflected in recent environmental assessments and state-wise performance scores. Rapid industrial growth, expanding urbanization, and intensive farming practices have significantly increased the pressure on rivers, lakes, groundwater, and coastal ecosystems.
Maharashtra, with a performance score of 58.5, faces heavy stress on its water resources, especially in Mumbai. The city alone discharges approximately 3,800 million liters per day (MLD) of sewage, much of which remains insufficiently treated. This burden is further intensified by industrial effluents, particularly heavy metals released from textile and related industries. According to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) 2022 assessment, the Godavari and Tapi rivers together contain 45 polluted segments, with chromium concentrations exceeding the safe limit of 0.1 mg/L, posing serious threats to aquatic life and human health.
Uttar Pradesh, with a score of 55, faces similar environmental challenges. The Ganga River in the state is severely polluted due to discharges from nearly 1,000 tanneries in Kanpur, leading to extremely high fecal coliform levels reaching 10⁶ MPN per 100 mL. This indicates widespread contamination from untreated industrial waste and domestic sewage.
Agricultural practices further aggravate water pollution and groundwater depletion. Punjab and Haryana, scoring 65 and 64 respectively, demonstrate excessive fertilizer and pesticide use, resulting in nitrate leaching into groundwater. According to NITI Aayog, nearly 80% of Punjab’s irrigated land alone accounts for 70% of national groundwater depletion. This over-extraction, along with nutrient runoff, has caused serious eutrophication in the Sutlej River, degrading water quality and aquatic ecosystems.
In contrast, several southern states have shown comparatively better performance due to stronger regulatory frameworks and diversified economic activities. Kerala, with a high score of 85, benefits from a tourism-focused economy rather than heavy industrialization. Its backwaters continue to maintain a healthy pH range between 6.5 and 8.5, indicating relatively stable water quality. Telangana, scoring 74, reflects growth driven mainly by Hyderabad’s IT sector rather than pollution-intensive industries. Cleanup efforts in the Musi River under the Namami Ganga initiative have led to a 20% reduction in Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) since 2020, reflecting measurable environmental improvement.
Urbanization, Population Dynamics, and Environmental Impact in India
Environmental degradation is also evident in Haryana, particularly in the city of Gurgaon. Here, industrial effluents often mix with domestic sewage and are discharged directly into the Yamuna River without proper treatment. This uncontrolled pollution has resulted in severe water contamination, leading to Haryana receiving a low environmental ranking of 64.
The rural-urban divide continues to play a crucial role in determining environmental outcomes across different states. Chhattisgarh, with an environmental ranking of 72, has shown remarkable improvement through rural sanitation initiatives under the Swachh Bharat Mission. The state aims to achieve 95% household sanitation coverage by 2024, significantly reducing pollution caused by open defecation.
On the other hand, Bihar continues to face serious challenges due to persistent rural poverty. Nearly 40% of the population still practices open defecation, resulting in increased coliform bacteria levels in the Sone River. This has worsened both water pollution and public health conditions in the region.
Despite these challenges, several government initiatives offer hope for the future. The Jal Jeevan Mission aims to provide piped drinking water to 78% of Indian households by mid-2025. This initiative is expected to significantly improve national standards of water quality and sanitation.
Odisha has already shown measurable success, improving its environmental ranking to 73. Since 2022, the state has established 50 new wastewater treatment plants, which have collectively reduced pollution in the Mahanadi River by 15%, marking a significant improvement in water management.
Governmental Initiatives and Future Trajectories in Water Resource Management in India
Impact on Uttar Pradesh and Key Cities
Groundwater Sustainability Initiatives
Community-Driven Success in Northeastern States
Future Challenges and Climate Change Risks
Another major concern remains the revival of the Yamuna River. The river continues to suffer from extreme pollution, particularly in the National Capital Region. It is estimated that Delhi alone will require an investment of approximately ₹10,000 crore to restore the Yamuna’s ecological health and ensure sustainable water quality.
Conclusion
The projected Water Quality Index (WQI) for 2025 emerges as a vital strategic instrument for guiding evidence-based policymaking and targeted interventions. By enabling the identification of high-risk zones and performance gaps, the WQI supports the formulation of region-specific, climate-sensitive solutions rather than uniform national approaches. The analysis clearly demonstrates that rainfall patterns, topography, vegetation cover, and population density collectively determine baseline water conditions. Regions characterized by dense forest cover and high precipitation benefit from natural dilution and filtration processes, whereas water-stressed, urbanized, and industrial belts suffer from concentrated pollution loads caused by untreated effluents, excessive groundwater withdrawal, and limited natural replenishment capacity.
Rapid urbanization, high population density, and historically inadequate environmental infrastructure continue to exert immense pressure on India’s freshwater systems. While states such as Goa and Odisha illustrate how effective governance, regulatory enforcement, and strategic infrastructure investment can deliver tangible environmental gains, economically weaker and densely populated states remain constrained by financial limitations, institutional capacity gaps, and governance challenges. This uneven progress underscores the urgent need for equitable investment in sanitation, wastewater treatment, and clean water access, particularly in vulnerable and rapidly expanding urban corridors.
In conclusion, India’s pursuit of sustainable water quality in 2025 and beyond will hinge on its ability to harmonize economic growth with environmental protection. Securing the nation’s water future requires a sustained, coordinated, and multi-sectoral strategy that integrates science, technology, governance, and public participation. Only through long-term commitment, region-specific planning, and collective responsibility can India protect its vital water resources, safeguard public health, preserve ecological integrity, and ensure water security for present and future generations.
- Source: Central Pollution Control Board. (2022). Polluted river stretches in India. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
- NITI Aayog. (2018). Composite water management index. Government of India.
- https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/CompositeWaterManagementIndex.pdf

